AIBioTrXiv uses editorial screening. It is not a substitute for peer review.
What screening checks
Screening verifies whether a submission is suitable for posting as an AIBioTrXiv record. It checks scope, basic structure, author declarations, AI-use transparency, rights information, and obvious quality problems.
- Does the submission fit AI-assisted theoretical biology, biological ideas, or biological product concepts?
- Is the manuscript or idea understandable and organized?
- Are claims presented with appropriate uncertainty?
- Are references, figures, and uploaded materials declared responsibly?
- Does the author accept responsibility for errors and reuse rights?
What screening does not guarantee
Screening does not certify truth, novelty, experimental validity, clinical utility, safety, legal ownership, patentability, or priority over all possible earlier sources. Readers should treat posted records as author-responsible archive records, not peer-reviewed conclusions.
Possible outcomes
- Accepted: the record can proceed to layout and publication.
- Revision requested: the author must clarify, correct, or improve the submission before further processing.
- Rejected: the submission will not be posted.
- Unpublished later: a posted record may be removed from public access if serious problems are found.
The US$5 submission fee covers processing and platform maintenance. It does not guarantee acceptance or publication.
